Dear Lisa,
The Nevsun v Araya case in Canada would fit the bill. Still waiting for the Supreme Court's judgment. There is also a 2013 decision of the Court of Appeal in Versailles on the Alstom and Veolia case. http://conflictoflaws.net/2013/a-european-sister-judgment-for-kiobel-2/
 |
conflictoflaws.net
An analysis of the Versailles Court of Appeal case AFPS and OLP v. Alstom and Veolia, by Elise Maes, Research fellow of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg On 22 March 2013, the Court of Appeal of Versailles (France) ruled in the case AFPS and OLP v. Alstom
and Veolia on the civil liability of two
|
|
Simon
Simon Baughen, Professor of Shipping Law, Athro Cyfraith Llongau.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-4501
From: Lisa Laplante <llaplante@nesl.edu>
Sent: 05 July 2019 19:38:05
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: principle of horizontality and corporate accountability
Sent: 05 July 2019 19:38:05
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: principle of horizontality and corporate accountability
Greetings,
I am currently trying to learn more about the horizontal principle as used to impose human rights obligations on non-state actors in tort lawsuits. In particular, I am interested in finding cases from non-U.S. jurisdictions that apply this principle with relation to corporate liability.
I appreciate any leads.
Thanks,
Lisa
Lisa J. Laplante
Professor of Law
Director, Center for International Law and Policy
http://www.nesl.edu/centers/cilp.cfm
New England Law | Boston
t: 617-422-7374
llaplante@nesl.edu
Professor of Law
Director, Center for International Law and Policy
http://www.nesl.edu/centers/cilp.cfm
New England Law | Boston
t: 617-422-7374
llaplante@nesl.edu